Paul Dickov "I am a little bit angry because it's a game we should have won, We've had a goal chalked off for what, I don't know. I've heard conflicting reports and I haven't even been to see the referee. If the goal is given, which it should have been, then we go on and win the game".

If he doesn't know why it was disallowed and he hasn't spoken to any of the officials perhaps he should reserve judgement? Swings and roundabouts Paul, swing and roundabouts! If the goal had have been awarded, Noble still might have scored. Is Paul also a fortune teller?

For those who haven't seen the highlights - Here we go

What do you make his these comments? Would Doncaster have won? Was the goal rightfully disallowed? Thoughts?

i dont see how he can comment without speaking to the officials, otherwise his opinion is how he sees it rather than what he said.

also, he thinks they would have won? well they did not win. sour grapes anyone?

Another manager who only sees what he wants to see or not see as the case may be.The ref's made his decision so no point in going on about it.Win some, lose some.Anyway,had the goal been given,Notts may still have equalised and the game gone to extra time.

He is under pressure, he will not paint the true picture.

I do think they played better and that might swing towards them deserving the win, it was not the case. Paul should learn to think before commenting!

Not as mighty as the magpies, he will get over it.

must suffer from Napoleon Complex....

Bitter little man, he has no idea at all.

It wasn't very clear on the replay, but it looked as though the keeper was being obstructed.

 

After mustering three shots on goal over 90 minutes at home, it's very convenient to blame the ref to divert attention from your own failings.

It's just typical manager speak to be honest, he's not going to agree with the ref and say he was right to disallow the goal, he's clutching on to anything that makes it look like they were unlucky to lose because he's worried about this own future.